This website uses cookies and other technologies to personalize content and ads on this and other websites and provide social media features. By clicking "I Agree" you consent to our use of tracking technologies and disclosure of tracking data to third party ad networks or social media companies for the purposes above. If you click "I Disagree" you can still use this website. For more information about Lilly’s privacy practice and to manage third-party preferences, click here.

Healthcare Provider Home

For Healthcare Providers

HOME

HOME

The first IL-17A antagonist now approved for adult patients across the spectrum of axSpA (nr-axSpA, AS)  

FOR BIOLOGIC-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Taltz vs Humira: Complete resolution of enthesitis at weeks 24 and 5210

SPIRIT-H2H BIOLOGIC-NAIVE: COMPLETE RESOLUTION OF ENTHESITIS (LEI=0) AT WEEK 24 AMONG PATIENTS WITH LEI>0 AT BASELINE, NRI

Enthesitis data were prespecified but not type-I error-controlled; therefore, results cannot be regarded as statistically significant.

A subset of patients from SPIRIT-H2H with enthesitis (LEI >0) at baseline.

Primary endpoint=simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI 100 at week 24.8

Mean baseline LEI scores were 2.5 for Taltz and 2.7 for Humira.8

All patients had BSA ≥3%; patients with BSA ≥10%, PASI ≥12, and sPGA ≥3 followed the dosing regimen indicated for moderate to severe PsO.

See SPIRIT-H2H Trial Design

SELECT IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
HYPERSENSITIVITY
Serious hypersensitivity reactions, including angioedema and urticaria (each ≤0.1%), occurred in the Taltz group in clinical trials. Anaphylaxis, including cases leading to hospitalization, has been reported in post-marketing use with Taltz. If a serious hypersensitivity reaction occurs, discontinue Taltz immediately and initiate appropriate therapy.

FOR BIOLOGIC-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Taltz vs Humira: Complete resolution of dactylitis at weeks 24 and 5211

SPIRIT-H2H BIOLOGIC-NAIVE: COMPLETE RESOLUTION OF DACTYLITIS LDI-B=0) AT WEEK 24 AMONG PATIENTS WITH LDI-B>0 AT BASELINE, NRI

Dactylitis data were prespecified but not type-I error-controlled; therefore, results cannot be regarded as statistically significant.

A subset of patients from SPIRIT-H2H with dactylitis (LDI-B >0) at baseline.

Primary endpoint=simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI 100 at week 24.8

Mean baseline LDI-B scores were 40 for Taltz and 56 for Humira.8

All patients had BSA ≥3%; patients with BSA ≥10%, PASI ≥12, and sPGA ≥3 followed the dosing regimen indicated for moderate to severe PsO.

See SPIRIT-H2H Trial Design

SELECT IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
Patients treated with Taltz may be at an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease. In clinical trials, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, including exacerbations, occurred at a greater frequency in the Taltz group than the placebo group. During Taltz treatment, monitor patients for onset or exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease and if IBD occurs, discontinue Taltz and initiate appropriate medical management.

FOR BIOLOGIC-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Superior PASI 100 response vs Humira at week 24, with consistency at week 5212

SPIRIT-H2H BIOLOGIC-NAIVE: PASI RESPONSE RATES AT WEEK 24, NRI

*P≤.001 vs Humira at week 24 for PASI 100.12

†P≤.001 vs Humira at week 52 for PASI 100.12 Nominal P value: Week 52 was not controlled for type-I error; therefore, no statistical comparisons can be made.

Primary endpoint=simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI 100 at week 24.8

All patients had BSA ≥3%; patients with BSA ≥10%, PASI ≥12, and sPGA ≥3 followed the dosing regimen indicated for moderate to severe psoriasis.8

See SPIRIT-H2H Trial Design

SELECT IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
IMMUNIZATIONS
Prior to initiating Taltz, consider completion of all age-appropriate immunizations according to current immunization guidelines. Avoid use of live vaccines in patients treated with Taltz.

IN BIOLOGIC-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Safety profile of Taltz in SPIRIT-H2H is consistent with registration trials; no new safety signals were observed8,13,14

The most frequent injection site reactions were erythema and pain. Most injection site reactions were mild to moderate in severity.14

Certain adverse events, such as MACE, malignancy, and cerebrocardiovascular events, require longer observation periods and larger patient exposure to ascertain risk. Lilly is conducting continued long-term safety studies, including post-marketing studies, to continue to evaluate the safety of Taltz.

*Safety data show all results available at the time of the last patient reaching week 24, including results to week 52.

†Patients with uncontrolled ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease were excluded from the studies; however, patients with a personal or family history of UC/Crohn’s were allowed in the study.

‡Confirmed by adjudication.

See SPIRIT-H2H Trial Design

FOR BIOLOGIC-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

SPIRIT-H2H:
Taltz vs Humira

TALTZ DEMONSTRATED:

  • Superiority vs Humira in the percentage of patients who achieved both ACR50 and PASI 100 at week 24, with consistency at week 521,6
  • Complete resolution in key domains of PsA2-4,10-12
    (Enthesitis, dactylitis, plaque psoriasis)
    Click here for data
  • Safety consistent with registration trials5,8,13,14
    Click here for data

See SPIRIT-H2H Trial Design

SPIRIT-P1 and P2 Registration Trial Data

TALTZ HAS NO BOXED WARNING.14

Theme logo

Think Psoriatic Arthritis. Think Taltz.

SELECT IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
ADVERSE REACTIONS
Most common adverse reactions (≥1%) associated with Taltz treatment are injection site reactions, upper respiratory tract infections, nausea, and tinea infections. Overall, the safety profiles observed in adult patients with psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and pediatric patients with plaque psoriasis were consistent with the safety profile in adult patients with plaque psoriasis, with the exception of influenza and conjunctivitis in psoriatic arthritis, and conjunctivitis, influenza, and urticaria in pediatric psoriasis.

References: 1. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0121. 2. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0122. 3. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0123. 4. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0124. 5. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0125. 6. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0190. 7. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0119. 8. Mease PJ, Smolen JS, Behrens F, et al. A head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biological-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a randomised, open-label, blinded-assessor trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:123-131. 9. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0189. 10. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0194. 11. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0195. 12. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0191. 13. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0188. 14. Taltz [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2020. 15. Mease PJ, van der Heijde D, Ritchlin CT, et al; on behalf of SPIRIT-P1 Study Group. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase 3 trial SPIRIT-P1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(suppl):1-30. 16. Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, et al; on behalf of SPIRIT-P2 Study Group. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2317-2327. 17. Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, et al; on behalf of SPIRIT-P2 Study Group. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2317-2327. Supplementary appendix.

Indications and Important Safety Information
Indications

Taltz is indicated for adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for adults with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and for adults with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) with objective signs of inflammation. Taltz is also indicated for patients aged 6 years or older with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy.

Important Safety Information
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Taltz is contraindicated in patients with a previous serious hypersensitivity reaction, such as anaphylaxis, to ixekizumab or to any of the excipients.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Infections
Taltz may increase the risk of infection. In clinical trials of adult patients with plaque psoriasis, the Taltz group had a higher rate of infections than the placebo group (27% vs 23%). A similar increase in risk of infection was seen in placebo-controlled trials of adult patients with psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and pediatric patients with plaque psoriasis. Serious infections have occurred. Instruct patients to seek medical advice if signs or symptoms of clinically important chronic or acute infection occur. If a serious infection develops, discontinue Taltz until the infection resolves.

Pre-Treatment Evaluation for Tuberculosis
Evaluate patients for tuberculosis (TB) infection prior to initiating treatment with Taltz. Do not administer to patients with active TB infection. Initiate treatment of latent TB prior to administering Taltz. Closely monitor patients receiving Taltz for signs and symptoms of active TB during and after treatment.

Hypersensitivity
Serious hypersensitivity reactions, including angioedema and urticaria (each ≤0.1%), occurred in the Taltz group in clinical trials. Anaphylaxis, including cases leading to hospitalization, has been reported in post-marketing use with Taltz. If a serious hypersensitivity reaction occurs, discontinue Taltz immediately and initiate appropriate therapy.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Patients treated with Taltz may be at an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease. In clinical trials, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, including exacerbations, occurred at a greater frequency in the Taltz group than the placebo group. During Taltz treatment, monitor patients for onset or exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease and if IBD occurs, discontinue Taltz and initiate appropriate medical management.

Immunizations
Prior to initiating therapy with Taltz, consider completion of all age-appropriate immunizations according to current immunization guidelines. Avoid use of live vaccines in patients treated with Taltz.

ADVERSE REACTIONS
Most common adverse reactions (≥1%) associated with Taltz treatment are injection site reactions, upper respiratory tract infections, nausea, and tinea infections. Overall, the safety profiles observed in adult patients with psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and pediatric patients with plaque psoriasis were consistent with the safety profile in adult patients with plaque psoriasis, with the exception of influenza and conjunctivitis in psoriatic arthritis and conjunctivitis, influenza, and urticaria in pediatric psoriasis.

Please click to access the Prescribing Information and Medication Guide. Please see Instructions for Use included with the device.
IX HCP ISI 07MAY2020

Are you a US Healthcare provider?

The information contained in this section of Taltz.com is intended for US Healthcare providers. Please confirm below.

No

Are you a US Healthcare provider?

The information contained in this section of Taltz.com is intended for US Healthcare providers. Please confirm below.

You are now leaving Taltz.com.

The link you clicked on will take you to a site maintained by a third party, which is solely responsible for its content. Lilly USA, LLC does not control, influence, or endorse this site, and the opinions, claims, or comments expressed on this site should not be attributed to Lilly USA, LLC. Lilly USA, LLC is not responsible for the privacy policy of any third-party websites. We encourage you to read the privacy policy of every website you visit.

Click "Continue" to leave site or "Return to Taltz.com" to close this window and return to Taltz.com.

Are you a US healthcare provider?

The information contained in this section of Taltz.com is intended for US Healthcare providers. Please confirm below.

SPIRIT-H2H: Trial design9

Taltz icon

SPIRIT-H2H (N=566) was a phase 4, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Taltz vs Humira in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis BSA ≥3%.

Patients who met the trial design criteria for moderate to severe psoriasis (BSA ≥10%, PASI ≥12, and sPGA ≥3) in addition to psoriatic arthritis followed the psoriasis dosing regimen: Taltz patients (n=49) received an initial dose of 160 mg (two 80 mg injections), followed by 80 mg every 2 weeks through week 12, then 80 mg every 4 weeks thereafter. Humira patients (n=52) received an initial dose of 80 mg, then 40 mg every other week starting 1 week after the initial dose. For Taltz patients with psoriatic arthritis only (n=234), the initial dose (160 mg as 2 injections) was followed by 80 mg every 4 weeks. Humira patients (n=231) received 40 mg every other week and no initial dose.

SPIRIT-H2H: Trial design1

SPIRIT-H2H (N=566) was a phase 4, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Taltz vs Humira® (adalimumab) in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis BSA ≥3%. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients simultaneously achieving ACR50 and PASI 100 at week 24. All patients were ≥18 years of age and had ≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints with an inadequate response to ≥1 cDMARD. Patients were randomized (1:1) to Taltz or Humira and allowed to continue a stable dose of concomitant cDMARD during the study. For Taltz patients with psoriatic arthritis only (n=234), the initial dose (160 mg as 2 injections) was followed by 80 mg every 4 weeks. Humira patients (n=231) received 40 mg every other week and no initial dose. Patients who met the trial design criteria for moderate to severe psoriasis (BSA ≥10%, PASI ≥12, and sPGA ≥3) in addition to psoriatic arthritis followed the psoriasis dosing regimen: Taltz patients (n=49) received an initial dose of 160 mg (two 80 mg injections), followed by 80 mg every 2 weeks through week 12, then 80 mg every 4 weeks thereafter. Humira patients (n=52) received an initial dose of 80 mg, then 40 mg every other week starting 1 week after the initial dose.

Reference:1. Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0119.

BSA=body surface area; ACR50=American College of Rheumatology 50% response;
PASI=Psoriasis Area Severity Index; cDMARD=conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; sPGA=static Physician's Global Assessment.

SPIRIT-P1 and -P2 Trial Design1-4

SPIRIT-P1 (N=417) and -P2 (N=363) were phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Taltz compared with placebo in patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Patients in SPIRIT-P1 were biologic-naive. Patients in SPIRIT-P2 were tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced, having had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to 1 or 2 prior TNFis. In both trials, the primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ACR20 response at week 24. All patients were ≥18 years of age and had ≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints. Patients were randomized to placebo or Taltz 80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks following a 160 mg starting dose. In SPIRIT-P1, an active reference arm of Humira® (adalimumab) 40 mg every 2 weeks was included. Patients in all study arms were allowed to continue taking stable background medications during the trial. Inadequate responders (as defined by blinded criteria of <20% improvement in tender and in swollen joint counts) at week 16 received rescue therapy and were analyzed as nonresponders after week 16 until the primary endpoint. After receiving rescue therapy, inadequate responders in the placebo and Humira arms were re-randomized to Taltz 80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks. Nonresponder imputation (NRI) methods were used for categorical efficacy analyses during the double-blind treatment period.

Reference: 1. Taltz [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2020. 2. Mease PJ, van der Heijde D, Ritchlin CT, et al; on behalf of SPIRIT-P1 Study Group. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase 3 trial SPIRIT-P1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(suppl):1-30. 3. Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, et al; on behalf of SPIRIT-P2 Study Group. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2317-2327. 4. Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, et al; on behalf of SPIRIT-P2 Study Group. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2317-2327. Supplementary appendix.

ACR20=American College of Rheumatology 20% response.

SPIRIT-P1 and -P2: Trial design12-15

Registration Trials

SPIRIT-P1 (N=417) and SPIRIT-P2 (N=363) were phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Taltz compared with placebo in patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Patients in SPIRIT-P1 were biologic-naive. Patients in SPIRIT-P2 were tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced, having had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to 1 or 2 prior TNFis. In both trials, the primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ACR20 response at week 24. All patients were ≥18 years of age and had ≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints. Patients were randomized to placebo or Taltz 80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks following a 160 mg starting dose. In SPIRIT-P1, an active reference arm of adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks was included. Patients in all study arms were allowed to continue taking stable background medications during the trial. Inadequate responders (as defined by blinded criteria of <20% improvement in tender and in swollen joint counts) at week 16 received rescue therapy and were analyzed as nonresponders after week 16 until the primary endpoint. After receiving rescue therapy, inadequate responders in the placebo and adalimumab arms were re-randomized to Taltz 80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks. Nonresponder imputation (NRI) methods were used for categorical efficacy analyses during the double-blind treatment period.

IXORA-PEDS TRIAL DESIGN

IXORA-PEDS (N=171) is an ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Taltz in pediatric patients aged 6 to <18 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. All patients have a diagnosis of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months, with a body surface area (BSA) of ≥10%, a static Physician’s Global Assessment (sPGA) score ≥3, and a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score ≥12, and are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. Patients were randomized to receive Taltz every 4 weeks (n=115), with dosing based on body weight, or placebo (n=56). Of patients receiving Taltz, those weighing <25 kg were randomized to Taltz 20 mg every 4 weeks following a 40 mg starting dose, those weighing 25 to 50 kg were randomized to Taltz 40 mg every 4 weeks following an 80 mg starting dose, and those weighing >50 kg were randomized to Taltz 80 mg following a starting dose of 160 mg. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving PASI 75 and sPGA 0,1 at week 12. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving the following measures: PASI 75 at week 4, sPGA 0,1 at week 4, PASI 90 at week 12, PASI 100 at week 12, sPGA 0 at week 12, and Itch Numeric Rating Scale (I-NRS) ≥4-point improvement at week 12. Nonresponder imputation methods (NRI) were used for categorical efficacy analyses.

Following the double-blind treatment period, patients are allowed to transition to an open-label maintenance period (weeks 12-60) and extension period (weeks 60-108) where all patients, regardless of initial treatment, will receive Taltz every 4 weeks through week 108. Patients who were taking placebo were initiated to Taltz with the appropriate weight-based starting dose, followed by the appropriate weight-based Q4W dose.

References: 1.Data on file. Lilly USA, LLC. DOF-IX-US-0211.